Reviewing CBA quarter changes
I recall that the CBA used 12-minute quarters for a long time, but in the 2023-24 season, they switched to 4x10 minutes. This change likely aligns with FIBA rules. It's key to be accurate with these details. I think Zhu Junlong, a forward for the Zhejiang Lions, might have mentioned how 10-minute quarters speed up the game, which is often true since shorter quarters can lead to higher intensity and fewer total possessions.Discussing international game adaptations
I'm analyzing how the 10-minute quarters and FIBA's 3-point line of 6.75m differ from the NBA's 7.24m. There are also various rules regarding defensive 3-second violations, goaltending, and timeouts that can impact game pace. Reducing quarter length could lead to increased intensity and lineup changes, which might help Team China adapt. I want to check if the user wants a translation into English or more details on these differences, but I’ll keep it concise.
确实有道理。FIBA 国际赛是一节10分钟，相比12分钟的联赛（如NBA，CBA过去多数赛季），比赛“单位时间强度”会更高，更贴近国家队节奏。
- 规则差异：FIBA 10分钟×4节、每节5次团队犯规、暂停更少且不能随便前场发球，节奏更连贯。
- 体能与轮换：每节更短、结束点更频繁，教练更快轮换，攻防强度提得更早。
- 战术节奏：8秒过半场、无防守三秒（允许联防/包线），逼迫进攻更快做决定，攻防切换更快。
- 适应收益：联赛按FIBA节奏打，国家队队员在犯规尺度、暂停/终结段处理、节奏管理上更顺手。
需要的话，我可以：
- 做一份 FIBA vs NBA/CBA 的关键规则对比表；
- 用回合数模型粗估10分钟与12分钟对节奏/数据的影响；
- 英文翻译这句话或扩写成新闻稿风格。